ASP源码.NET源码PHP源码JSP源码JAVA源码DELPHI源码PB源码VC源码VB源码Android源码
当前位置:首页 >> 数据库 >> 其他数据库 >> Cassandra vs MongoDB vs CouchDB vs Redis vs Riak vs HBase vs Couchbase vs Orient

Cassandra vs MongoDB vs CouchDB vs Redis vs Riak vs HBase vs Couchbase vs Orient(8/8)

来源:网络整理     时间:2016-04-07     关键词:

本篇文章主要介绍了"Cassandra vs MongoDB vs CouchDB vs Redis vs Riak vs HBase vs Couchbase vs Orient",主要涉及到方面的内容,对于其他数据库感兴趣的同学可以参考一下: The most popular onesRedis (V3.0RC)Written in: CMain point: Blazing fastLicense:...

  • Written in: C++
  • Main point: A lightweight network DBM
  • License: GPL
  • Protocol: HTTP (TSV-RPC or REST)
  • Based on Kyoto Cabinet, Tokyo Cabinet's successor
  • Multitudes of storage backends: Hash, Tree, Dir, etc (everything from Kyoto Cabinet)
  • Kyoto Cabinet can do 1M+ insert/select operations per sec (but Tycoon does less because of overhead)
  • Lua on the server side
  • Language bindings for C, Java, Python, Ruby, Perl, Lua, etc
  • Uses the "visitor" pattern
  • Hot backup, asynchronous replication
  • background snapshot of in-memory databases
  • Auto expiration (can be used as a cache server)

Best used: When you want to choose the backend storage algorithm engine very precisely. When speed is of the essence.

For example: Caching server. Stock prices. Analytics. Real-time data collection. Real-time communication. And wherever you used memcached before.

Of course, all these systems have much more features than what's listed here. I only wanted to list the key points that I base my decisions on. Also, development of all are very fast, so things are bound to change.

http://kkovacs.eu/cassandra-vs-mongodb-vs-couchdb-vs-redis/

以上就介绍了Cassandra vs MongoDB vs CouchDB vs Redis vs Riak vs HBase vs Couchbase vs Orient,包括了方面的内容,希望对其他数据库有兴趣的朋友有所帮助。

本文网址链接:http://www.codes51.com/article/detail_590218_8.html

相关图片

相关文章